?s

1.) Does our subjective condition, namely our a priori intuition of space and time, prevent us from knowing anything objectively?
2.) How is it that Kant can call our concepts of understanding a priori if he deduced them from experience?
3.) Since Kant's list of concepts was a major area of revision, and, in addition, is widely regarded as incomplete, can we say that his overall argument is flawed as a result?
4.) Is there anything in the "manifold" that cannot be combined, or unified?
5.) Must synthesis always precede analysis? If so, is this Kant's best response to Hume's skeptical view of causality?