1. How is it that the transcendental deduction establishes objective validity?
2. How is it that a priori concepts can be considered universal, especially when the conditions for experience are subjective? How can these conditions achieve objective validity?
3. How can we ever establish a convincing distinction between empirical deductions and a simple empirical observation that relies on a priori concepts being present?
4. What, other than necessity, is the justification for claiming that space and time have a synthetic apprehension that stands a priori? How can this apprehension be a priori if it depends on the act of apprehension itself?
5. How does Kant establish an objective determination of synthetic and analytic concepts?
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment