Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Q&A

1. How is it that the transcendental deduction establishes objective validity?

2. How is it that a priori concepts can be considered universal, especially when the conditions for experience are subjective? How can these conditions achieve objective validity?

3. How can we ever establish a convincing distinction between empirical deductions and a simple empirical observation that relies on a priori concepts being present?

4. What, other than necessity, is the justification for claiming that space and time have a synthetic apprehension that stands a priori? How can this apprehension be a priori if it depends on the act of apprehension itself?

5. How does Kant establish an objective determination of synthetic and analytic concepts?

No comments: